S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Sumikin Bussan (Hong Kong) International Limited – Appellant
Versus
Manharlal Trikamdas Mody – Respondent
S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.
( 1 ) THIS is an Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge allowing the Chamber Summons taken out by Respondent No. 2 by directing the amendment of the terms and conditions of sale of a flat, in execution, recognising the right of respondent No. 2 therein under a leave and license agreement dated 8. 10. 2001. PRELIMINARY FACTS :
( 2 ) THE Appellant is a judgment creditor having obtained a decree dated 31. 5. 2002 against Respondent no. 1 passed by the High Court of the Hong Kong special Administrative Region, Court of First instance, in Action No. 4761 of 2 in the sum of US $616 with interest. Respondent No. 1 is the judgment debtor. On 26. 3. 2003 the above Execution application was taken out by the Appellant for execution of the decree of a sum of Rs. 3,48,98,644. 84 inter-alia against a flat owned, according to the appellant, by Respondent No. 1. According to respondent No. 1, he is the co-owner of Flat No. 201, silver Arch, Nepan Sea Road, Mumbai alongwith his wife. This is a dispute with which we are not concerned in this Appeal. A warrant of sale of the said flat was issued on 21. 5. 2004 and a proclamation of a sale thereof has also been
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.