SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 758

S.U.KAMDAR
Metal Box India Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Rangari, Asst. Commissioner of Labour – Respondent


( 1 ) THE present writ petition is filed challenging the order dt. 16. 11. 02 passed by the appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity act, 1972, Bombay. Some of the material facts of the present case are briefly enumerated as under:

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1 of 1956 and have various units in different states. It is the case of the petitioners that in 1987 the worth of the company got fully eroded and there was a negative wealth and accordingly the companys management suspended operations of all its manufacturing units and approached BIFR for a revival scheme, On 27. 5. 88 the BIFR declared the company as a SICK undertaking within the meaning of section 3 (1) (c) of SICA, 1985. In 1988 the present management took over the company and ultimately reopened the Mahol Unit in july, 1988 and the Deonar Unit in October, 1988. In 1992 they reopened the Bombay unit. On 10. 11. 85 the Honble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No. 1018795 directed the company to submit the scheme of rehabilitation under the SICA Act. On 31. 12. 95 the rehabilitation scheme was formulated and forwarded to BIFR by the operating agency. On 8. 3. 96 the BIFR formula























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top