( 1 ) ORIGINAL opponent Dnyaneshwar Maroti bhusari, being dissatisfied with the order dated 28-7-2001, passed by the principal Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad, in Petition No. E-753/2000 directing him to play maintenance at the rate of Rs. 300/- per month to the original applicant No. 1 - present Respondent No. 1, from the date of application, filed criminal Revision Application No. 283/2001, whereas original applicants No. 1 and 2, being dissatisfied with the said order refusing to grant maintenance to the applicant No. 2 Yogesh and granting inadequate maintenance to the applicant no. 1, filed Criminal Revision Application No. 49/2002 with a request to grant maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1000/- per month to each of the applicants.

( 2 ) AS both these Revisions are arising out of the very same order, passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad, I feel it desirable to dispose of these Revisions by this common order.

( 3 ) THE facts in nutshell, leading to the present Revisions, are tha t: original applicant No. 1 Pushpabai and applicant No. 2 Yogesh Bhusari have filed an application on 21-11-2000 for maintenance under section 125 of the criminal Procedure Code before th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document