SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 107

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI
Tanya Bungalow, Behind VIP Complex, Nashik Poona Road, Nashik – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


( 1 ) THE applicant is applying for bail in Central bureau Investigation Case No. R. C.-6/2004/ e. O. U.-VII - New Delhi corresponding to Crime no. 123/2000 registered at Satpur Police Station, nashik for offences punishable under sections 349, 120b, 255 to 259, 420, 460, 468, 472 and 475 of Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3, 4 and 24 of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as "mcoc Act" for the sake of brevity ). The applicant was arrested on 8th October 2004. He applied for bail vide criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 16 of 2004 which was rejected by Special Judge, MCOC, Pune order dated 29th November 2004. This is how the present application for bail is preferred.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case, briefly stated, is that the complainant Head Constable D. P. Raje Bhosale of Crime Branch, Nashik along with Police inspector Anil Deshmukh, PSI R. M. Pawar, ASI gosavi, Head Constable Devkar, Police Constable bidve, Police Constable Pangarkar and Police constable Labhade of Nashik Crime Branch while patrolling the city area on 10th October 2000, allegedly spotted a white Maruti Van parked near mauli Petrol Pump, Nashik-Trimbak Road bearing no.
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top