SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 107

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Tanya Bungalow, Behind VIP Complex, Nashik Poona Road, Nashik
Versus .
State of Maharashtra
Decided on , JANUARY 25, 2006

The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicant's active assistance and abetment of the organised crime syndicate, leading to charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999.

Headnote:

BAIL - Criminal Investigation - Indian Penal Code, Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - 349, 120b, 255-259, 420, 460, 468, 472, 475, 3, 4, 24 - The court discussed the offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, including the recovery of counterfeit stamps, fabrication of investigation records, and pecuniary benefits received by the accused. The legal provisions were interpreted to establish the applicant's active assistance and abetment of the organised crime syndicate, leading to the rejection of the bail application.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant applied for bail in a case involving the recovery of counterfeit stamps and fabrication of investigation records. The prosecution alleged that the applicant actively assisted and abetted the organised crime syndicate for pecuniary benefits.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicant was charged with serious offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, for his active assistance and abetment of the organised crime syndicate. The court rejected the bail application based on the prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in the unlawful activities.

Issues: The issues involved the applicant's alleged protection of the organised crime syndicate, fabrication of investigation records, and acceptance of pecuniary benefits, leading to charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the legal provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 to establish the applicant's guilt based on prima facie evidence of his active assistance and abetment of the organised crime syndicate.

Final Decision: The bail application was rejected based on the court's finding of reasonable grounds for believing that the applicant was guilty of offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999.

( 1 ) THE applicant is applying for bail in Central bureau Investigation Case No. R. C.-6/2004/ e. O. U.-VII - New Delhi corresponding to Crime no. 123/2000 registered at Satpur Police Station, nashik for offences punishable under sections 349, 120b, 255 to 259, 420, 460, 468, 472 and 475 of Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3, 4 and 24 of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as "mcoc Act" for the sake of brevity ). The applicant was arrested on 8th October 2004. He applied for bail vide criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 16 of 2004 which was rejected by Special Judge, MCOC, Pune order dated 29th November 2004. This is how the present application for bail is preferred.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case, briefly stated, is that the complainant Head Constable D. P. Raje Bhosale of Crime Branch, Nashik along with Police inspector Anil Deshmukh, PSI R. M. Pawar, ASI gosavi, Head Constable Devkar, Police Constable bidve, Police Constable Pangarkar and Police constable Labhade of Nashik Crime Branch while patrolling the city area on 10th October 2000, allegedly spotted a white Maruti Van parked near mauli Petrol Pump, Nashik-Trimbak Road bearing no. BLL-3292 and found four persons in the vehicle namely Sachin Gotiram Zhaveri, Raju Tukaram satpute, Ajay Shivaji Dhisale and Jitu Premchand harvani. On suspicion, vehicle was searched. The search resulted in recovery of a plastic bag containing 20 sheets (each sheet containing 180 stamps) of Insurance Stamps of Rs. 500/- denomination amounting to Rs. 18. 00 lakh. On interrogation of Ajay Dhisale it was revealed that he worked as a Driver for one Jaikishan singh @ Bengali. This person kept a suitcase with Dhisale after telling him that it contains office papers. After interrogation of Dhisale, police team conducted search of residential premises of Bengali at 1916, Maharashtra Housing colony, Satpur in the presence of Savita, his wife. At this search, about 40 sheets of insurance Stamps of denomination of Rs. 20/- and rs. 1,000/- (each sheet containing 180 Stamps) amounting to Rs. 36. 72 lakh were recovered. The crime Branch, Nashik arrested all the abovementioned persons on 10th October 2000. Thereafter, they were produced before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nashik on 11th October 2000. Their police custody remand was sought. It is also alleged that permission to investigate the offence was sought under section 124 of the Bombay Police Act as applicable at that time. The learned Court denied police custody remand of all the accused on 11th October 2000. The seized Insurance stamps were sent to Indian Security Press, Nashik by Crime Branch for expert opinion. The expert opinion was received stating that these stamps were counterfeit. Therefore, the abovenamed crime was registered against the above persons. The case was entrusted to PSI Pawar for investigation. He filed charge sheet on 31st december 2000 (C. C. No. 31/2000) in the Court of judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nashik against the above persons arraying them as accused and also the said Bengali who was shown as absconding. Thereafter, the said Bengali was arrested on 25th January 2001 by Crime Branch, after getting him transferred from Tihar Jail, delhi where he was lodged in Crime No. 678/2000 of kalkaji Police Station, New Delhi. PSI Pawar took police custody remand of Bengali. His statement was recorded wherein he disclosed that hemant Dubey, Subhashbhai and Shivshankar were the persons responsible for printing of stamps, perforation and circulation of stamps in Nashik. PSI Pawar filed supplementary charge sheet on 8th may 2001 against said Bengali and the persons named by him. They were shown as untraceable at the relevant time. It appears that Hemant Dubey was arrested on 7th June 2001 from Thane and his police custody was obtained. However, subsequently an application was made in the Court of JMFC, Nashik for discharging Hemant Dubey. The ground of discharge was state
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top