SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1387

RANJANA DESAI, ANOOP V.MOHTA
Adnan Bilal Mulla – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

DESAI RANJANA, J.

( 1 ) ADMIT. Respondent waives service. By consent of the parties taken up for hearing forthwith.

( 2 ) THE appellant along with others is being tried in POTA Special Case No. 2/03 in the Special Court constituted under The Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 ("pota" for short ).

( 3 ) IN this case the appellant accused preferred application for certain reliefs. The application preferred by the appellant is M. A. No. 26/05. The application contained following prayers: a) To restrain the Prosecution from proceeding with a joint trial in respect of mulund Bomb Blast offence i. e. DCB, CID C. R. No. 21/03, the Vile parle Bomb Blast i. e. C. R. No. 09/03 and the Bombay Central Bomb blast i. e. C. R. No. 124/02 i. e. 59/03. b) To direct the Respondents/prosecution to take comply with the necessary pre-trial formalities in order to separately proceed in respect of Mulund blast vide C. R. No. 21/03. Vile Parle Blast vide C. R. No. 09/03 and mumbai Central Blast vice C. R. No. 59/03. c) To stay framing of charges of Joint Trial in POTA SPL. Case No. 2/2003 till final hearing and disposal of this application.

( 4 ) THE special Court by its order dated 30th July, 2005



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top