SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1392

S.B.MHASE, S.R.SATHE
LAXMAN BABAN WAGHE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Judgment

S. B. MHASE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 15-6-1999 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in sessions Case No. 229 of 1997, holding the Appellants guilty under sections 302, 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I. P. C.) and thereby sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under section 302 read with 34, Indian Penal Code and further sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- (Rupees One hundred Only) in default to suffer simple imprisonment for fifteen days, for the offence punishable under section 201 read with 34, Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) INITIALLY, there were five accused persons against whom the prosecution was launched by the State. However, accused Nos. 1, 2 and 5 have been acquitted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan. The present appeal has been preferred by Original accused Nos. 3 and 4. (For the sake of convenience, they are referred to as accused Nos. 3 and 4 respectively)

( 3 ) THE deceased is Harishchandra Bhoir. He was employed with one pundalik Mhatre as watchman on the building namely "aditya Kuti




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top