SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1500

S.A.BOBDE
Dilawar Hakim Shah – Appellant
Versus
Special Recovery Officer, Chiplun Urban cooperative Bank Ltd – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) RULE, returnable forthwith. The learned counsel for the respective respondents waive service of rule. Heard by consent.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has challenged the order dated 22. 2. 2005 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, co-operative societies, Konkan Division, refusing to accept his revision application on the ground that he has not deposited 50% amount of the total amount of recoverable dues as required under section 154 (2a) of the maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, hereinafter referred to as the "act". Admittedly, the recovery certificate was issued on 30. 8. 2003 and the petitioner filed the revision on 22. 2. 2005. This application for revision was made after the period of limitation of two months had expired. The petitioner, therefore, applied for condonation of delay.

( 3 ) WITHOUT considering the application for condonation of delay, the Divisional Joint Registrar has rejected the petitioners revision on the ground that he has not deposited 50% amount of the total amount of recoverable dues as required by section 154 (2a) of the Act. There is no dispute that this deposit is mandatory.

( 4 ) THE question that arises for consideration is whether




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top