SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1441

P.S.BRAHME, B.R.GAVAI
SURESH s/o LAHORMAL KHATRI – Appellant
Versus
BALKISAN s/o SHIVNARAYANJI CHANDAK – Respondent


Judgment

P. S. BRAHME, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the records.

( 2 ) THE order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 4756 of 2004 on 25th February, 2005 is the subject-matter of challenge in this appeal. The learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition confirming the order dated 4-10-2004 passed by the Joint Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Amravati. The learned Joint civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Amravati vide his order dated 4-10-2004 dismissed the r. M. J. C. No. 33 of 2004 filed by the appellant wherein he has sought for extension of time and R. M. J. C. No. 59 of 2004 filed by respondent No. 1 for rescission of contract came to be allowed.

( 3 ) THE facts which are not in dispute may be stated in brief as follows :-The appellant filed Special Civil Suit No. 69 of 2001 on 30-3-2001 against the respondent No. 1 (sole defendant) for specific performance of contract on the basis of agreement of sale dated 9-2-2001 whereunder the defendant agreed to sell his house property to the appellant. The learned Civil Judge by his judgment and order dated 29-12-2001 decreed the suit and the appellant was directed to pay balance amount of Rs. 72,00,000/- w



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top