D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, F.I.REBELLO
Indravati Rajan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Shantidevi Kamleshkumar Yadav – Respondent
F. I. REBELLO, J.
( 1 ) APPEARANCE has been put up on behalf of Respondent No. 3. None present for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Even otherwise considering the order to be passed, notice on them dispensed with. Rule, made returnable forthwith.
( 2 ) AT the general election held to fill in the seats to Respondent No. 3 corporation, Respondent No. 1 was declared elected. The seat was reserved for female (OBC) candidate. An election petition was filed by a voter before the Additional Chief judge, Court of Small Causes at Mumbai being election Petition No. 30 of 2002. Reliefs sought were to set aside the election of respondent No. 1 and to declare Respondent no. 2 as elected. The Petition was allowed and the election of Respondent No. 1 was set aside. At the same time, the Learned additional Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes declared Respondent No. 2 deemed to be elected against the vacancy occasioned by unseating of Respondent No. 1. It appears that an objection came to be raised against respondent No. 2 on the ground that she did not belong to the notified OBC caste. The matter for verification of the caste claim of respondent No. 2 was forwarded to the caste scrutiny committee w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.