SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1158

A.P.DESHPANDE, VASANTI A.NAIK
Surendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

A. P. DESHPANDE, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, by filing the instant petition, is challenging an order passed by the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate scrutiny Committee, Nashik, rejecting the tribe claim of the petitioner to mannerwarlu, scheduled Tribe. The petitioner came to be selected for being appointed as Police Sub- inspector consequent upon his selection by the maharashtra Public Service Commission against a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe. Maharashtra Public Service Commission recommended the name of the petitioner for being appointed as Police Sub-Inspector and accordingly the petitioner came to be appointed in the said post. The petitioner was selected by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission in the examination held in the year 1987 and the petitioner was communicated about the same vide letter dated 04-04-1988. The petitioner was then sent for practical training and on successful completion of the training, joined regular service under the Statute with effect from 13-06-1989.

( 2 ) THE caste (tribe) certificate possessed by the petitioner was referred to the committee for its scrutiny and verification. In the first instance, the Scrutiny Committee rejected the

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top