SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1280

RANJANA DESAI
MILIND DATTATREYA SUGAVKAR – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI – Respondent


( 1 ) RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the original plaintiff. He is a practicing advocate. He is appearing in person. Respondent 1 is the Municipal Corporation of Greater mumbai (for short "the Corporation" ). Respondent 2 is one Mangesh Shripad sanzagiri, who is the Secretary of Shri Sai Niketan Co-operative Housing Society limited (for short, "the said society") situated in CTS No. 236, Plot No. 9, S. V. P. Road, Ground floor, Survey No. 22, Borivali (West), Mumbai - 400103.

( 3 ) THE facts which are necessary to understand the controversy may be shortly stated as under : the petitioners brother is the member of the said society. Flat No. 1 on the ground floor of the said society stands in his name. The Corporation issued a notice under section 351 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act (for short, "the said Act") calling upon the petitioner to demolish the alleged unauthorised structure being front portion of hall, admeasuring 12 x 4 x 9. 6, ground floor of Flat no. 1, Shri Sai Niketan CHS Ltd. , CTS No. 236, Hissa No. 2, Plot No. 9, Survey no. 22, Madonna Colony, S. V. P. Road, Borivali (West), Mumbai-400103.

( 4 ) IT is












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top