SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1254

K.J.ROHEE
AMAR SINGH s/o NARENDRA SINGH BAIS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


x( 1 ) HEARD finally by consent of parties. The applicant is one of the accused persons facing trial for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201, 304b read with section 34 of the Indian penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in Session Trial no. 90/2003. The applicant failed to secure bail on merits. Thereafter, by order dated 10th May, 2004 the applicant was released by the trial Court as it was found that the applicant was of unsound mind and was incapable of making his defence. It seems that after the release of the applicant he ceased to be of unsound mind and the trial not only resumed but had proceeded inasmuch as on 5th November, 2004 PW Nos. 1 and 2 were examined by the prosecution. It seems that thereafter, no prosecution witness turned up and the trial was adjourned from time to time.

( 2 ) ON 30th March, 2005 the learned A. P. P. , in-charge of the trial, moved an application for cancellation of the bail of the applicant on the ground that the applicant became of sound mind and was capable of making his defence. By order dated 18th July, 2005 the learned trial Judge allowed the application, cancelled the bail of the applicant and took him in




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top