SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 45

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
Ashabai Laxman Gawande – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division – Respondent


Judgment

DHARMADHIKARI B. P. , J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of constitution of India the petitioner, a Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Dapura questions the order dated 5th January 2004 passed by Additional Commissioner Amravati Division Amravati holding that she has incurred disqualification under section 14 (1) (g) read with section 16 (2) of Bombay Village panchayat Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ). The Additional commissioner has set aside the order dated 29th October, 2003 passed by additional Collector Akola in favour of petitioner. Proceedings before the Collector were initiated by present respondent No. 2 Vasantrao. It is the contention of petitioner that respondent No. 2 had initially tried to unseat her through his wife who contested the election unsuccessfully against her.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 2 filed application in July 2003 under section 14 (l) (g) of the Act before Additional Collector Akola pointing out that the petitioner has obtained advantage of a scheme for construction of houses for poor people and got construction of house under said scheme sanctioned in favour of her husband Laxman. He further asserted that Secretary of Gram









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top