SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 184

D.G.DESHPANDE
Vrajesh Navnitlal Desai – Appellant
Versus
K. Bagyam – Respondent


Judgment

D. G. DESHPANDE, J.

( 1 ) HEARD advocate for the appellant. Respondents are served. Nobody is present for them. This appeal is for enhancement of compensation granted by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, raigad at Alibag by its judgment dated 31. 7. 1997. Since there is no cross-appeal or counter-appeal by any of the respondents, their liability to pay compensation has to be held in favour of the appellant. The question is of quantum. In the accident occurred, the present appellant suffered 44 per cent permanent partial disability. Certificate to that extent was proved by this appellant before the Tribunal by examining the doctor. Disability is in respect of inability to make movements of leg. The doctor stated that he, the appellant, will not be able to stand more than 2-3 hours and he cannot bend his leg, he cannot sit. He will have to undergo operation in future when pain will become intolerable. Hip joints which were replaced at the time of surgery, will have to be changed because, according to the doctor, artificial joints give problems after 15 to 18 years.

( 2 ) THE claimant in his evidence stated that he cannot use Indian toilet, cannot sit on ground for taking m





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top