SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 119

S.U.KAMDAR
RASIKLAL MANIKCHAND DHARIWAL – Appellant
Versus
KISHORE WASHWANI – Respondent


Judgment

S. U. KAMDAR, J.

( 1 ) THE present chamber summons has been taken out by the plaintiff under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code for carrying out amendment to the plaint.

( 2 ) SOME of the material facts in the present case briefly stated are as under:

( 3 ) ORIGINALLY a suit was filed by the plaintiff against Mr. Kishore washwani in his capacity as the proprietor of a business known as Messrs M. S. S. Food Products. The said suit was filed for the purpose of perpetual order and injunction restraining the defendant from passing off or selling or attempting to sell or offering for sale or from distributing or attempting to distribute or dealing in or attempiing to deal in Supari Mix or goods of similar description bearing mark "malikchand" or any mark or label identical with and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs Trade Mark "manikchand". Further reliefs are sought of accounts and/or other consequential and incidental reliefs. The said suit came to be filed on 3-2-2004 and an ex-parte application was moved for interim orders being Notice of Motion No. 606 of 2004. However, during the pendency of the suit, the plaintiffs were informed that the trade mark "malikcha



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top