SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 271

A.P.SHAH, S.J.VAZIFDAR
Goldcrestexports – Appellant
Versus
N. V. Suissoen – Respondent


Judgment

S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of the learned single Judge dismissing the appellants petition filed under section 34 of the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to challenge an award passed by the second respondent. The Federation of Oils, Seeds and Fats Associations Ltd. (FOSFA ).

( 2 ) THE two questions, both of which we have answered in the negative, that arise for our consideration are : (i) Whether a party against whom a foreign award is made is entitled to challenge the same under section 34 of the Act? (ii) Whether the mere denial of the existence of the agreement by the party against whom an award is made is entitled to challenge the same under section 34 if the award otherwise would be a foreign award and despite the party in whose favour the award is made stating that it treats the award as a foreign award and shall not either seek its enforcement or rely upon the same for any purpose as a domestic award.

( 3 ) THE controversy lies in a very narrow compass. The first respondents case is that two contracts dated the 19th September, 2003 and 24th September, 2003 were entered into between the petitioner/appellant and the first responde


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top