SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 355

S.U.KAMDAR
SICOM Limited – Appellant
Versus
Balkrishna Himmatramka – Respondent


Judgment

KAMDAR S. U. , J.

( 1 ) THE present petition is filed under the provisions of section 3 l (l) (aa) of the STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS ACT, 1951. The petitioner is a financial institution. Some time in or about February, 1993 the company known as Sanjivani Agro Industries approached the petitioner with a request to grant a loan of more than Rs. 110. 00 lacs for setting up a plant for solvent extraction and oil refinery at Plot No. A/1 in the Palus Industrial Area of midc within the village limits of Palus, Taluka Tasgaon, District Sangli.

( 2 ) THE said application for grant of term -loan was sanctioned by the company and the said loan amount was advanced by the petitioner to the said company. The company executed an indenture of mortgage dated 16-8-1993 securing the said loan amount and mortgaged the plant, machinery and building of the company with the said financial institution. The respondent herein being respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have executed the deed of guarantee dated 16-8-1993 and the respondent Nos. 2 and 5 has executed the deed of guarantee dated 20-9-1993 in favour of the petitioner herein guaranting the repayment of the aforesaid amount by the respondent company w








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top