SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 337

N.A.BRITTO
Valmiki Faleiro – Appellant
Versus
Lauriana Fernandes e Diniz – Respondent


Judgment

N. A. BRITTO, J.

( 1 ) THESE are complainants revision applications arising from c. C. No. 284/p/2001 and against the common order of the learned Sessions judge, Margao dated 22-7-2004 in Criminal Revision Applications Nos. 63, 64, 67 and 68 2003. Hence, this common judgment.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the accused Nos. 1 and 2 in the said criminal case put a public notice on "navhind Times" dated 13-5-2001 which reads as follows :-"notice is hereby given to the public that one Mr. Valmiki Faleiro resident of margao and others who are developing and selling the plots through their power of Attorneys, agents, etc. form the property surveyed between nos. 251 to 522 including all sub-divisions of village Cacora, taluka a Quepem are not the owners of the said property. The actual owners and the holder of the said property as well as the property surveyed under Nos. 1 to 323 including all sub-divisions of village Xeldem and parts of adjoining villages Amona, Sirvoi, Avedem, Chalfi, Assolda, cottombi, Xie Xelvon, Xelvon, Odar, Cusmane, Ambulim, Quepem and deao all taluka a Quepem are Mrs. Lauriana Fernandese Diniz, Luciana diniz and Anastasia Diniz. Public is hereby warned by this noti




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top