N.A.BRITTO
Valmiki Faleiro – Appellant
Versus
Lauriana Fernandes e Diniz – Respondent
N. A. BRITTO, J.
( 1 ) THESE are complainants revision applications arising from c. C. No. 284/p/2001 and against the common order of the learned Sessions judge, Margao dated 22-7-2004 in Criminal Revision Applications Nos. 63, 64, 67 and 68 2003. Hence, this common judgment.
( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the accused Nos. 1 and 2 in the said criminal case put a public notice on "navhind Times" dated 13-5-2001 which reads as follows :-"notice is hereby given to the public that one Mr. Valmiki Faleiro resident of margao and others who are developing and selling the plots through their power of Attorneys, agents, etc. form the property surveyed between nos. 251 to 522 including all sub-divisions of village Cacora, taluka a Quepem are not the owners of the said property. The actual owners and the holder of the said property as well as the property surveyed under Nos. 1 to 323 including all sub-divisions of village Xeldem and parts of adjoining villages Amona, Sirvoi, Avedem, Chalfi, Assolda, cottombi, Xie Xelvon, Xelvon, Odar, Cusmane, Ambulim, Quepem and deao all taluka a Quepem are Mrs. Lauriana Fernandese Diniz, Luciana diniz and Anastasia Diniz. Public is hereby warned by this noti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.