SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 405

A.B.NAIK, N.V.DABHOLKAR
Sunil s/o. Ramdas Kotkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

A. B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) HEARD respective counsel.

( 2 ) BY this order, we propose to dispose of this Writ Petition finally, at the stage of motion hearing, in view of the order passed by this Court on 3rd November, 2004 whereby, our Brothers : Zoting and deshpande, JJ, have passed the following order: "parties are put on notice that the matter will be decided at the admission stage after vacation. " in view of this, we heard this Writ Petition on 28th February, 2005 at length, which remained part heard. On ! st March, 2005 we completed the hearing and the matter was posted for judgment.

( 3 ) BY this Petition, as many as nine petitioners are seeking the following reliefs : " (B) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 19-5-2004 passed by the respondent no. 3 appointing the respondent no. 4 as a Leader of opposition in Respondent no. 2 corporation and for that purpose issue necessary orders. (C) Issue writ of mandamus or direction directing the Respondent No. 3 - Mayor to grant recognition to the proposal dated 24-02-2004 for the post of leader of Opposition submitted by indian National Congres






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top