SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1077

R.M.LODHA
SUJATA SANZGIRY – Appellant
Versus
ANKUSH R. NAIK – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS first appeal is directed against the Judgment and order (deemed decree) dated 9th October, 1997, passed by the Executive Court on an application under Order 21, Rule 97 of Code of Civil Procedure (cpc, for short ).

( 2 ) THE appeal arises in the facts and circumstances which may be briefly indicated first :"i. By an Agreement for Sale dated 5th August, 1989, the first respondent agreed to sell the Flat No. 201. St. Inez, Panaji, Goa, to the appellant for a consideration stated therein. ii. The respondent No. 1 failed to honour the agreement for sale which necessitated the appellant to file a suit for specific performance and delivery of possession against the respondent no. 1 on 13-2-1991. iii. In the suit filed by the appellant, an application was made for temporary injunction restraining the respondent No. 1 from inducting any third party. iv. The ex parte temporary injunction was granted by the Trial Courts on 13-2-1991 which was later on confirmed on 27-8-1991. v. The dispute raised by the present appellant in the suit for specific performance and delivery of possession was referred to the Arbitrator. vi. On 27-5-1993, the Arbitrator passed an Award in favour of the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top