SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 147

VISHNU SAHAI, P.V.KAKADE
BALU SHRAVAN AHIRE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Judgment

P. V. KAKADE, J.

( 1 ) SINCE all the three appeals, namely, criminal Appeal No. 98 of 1996, Criminal Appeal No. 93 of 1996 and Criminal Appeal No. 106 of 1996 arise out of the same set of facts and a common Judgment and Order dated 6th january, 1996 passed by the learned Additional Sessions judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 640 of 1994 are disposing them off by one judgment. The three appellants were convicted for the offence under section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to imprisonment for life. They were further found guilty for the offence under section 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to suffer R. I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- each, in default to suffer further R. I. for three months. They were further convicted for offence under section 392 read with 397 of the Indian Penal Code. They were sentenced to suffer r. I. for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, in default to suffer R. I. for one year under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. They were separately sentenced to suffer R. I. for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, in default to suffer R. I. for one year for
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top