SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 569

V.G.MUNSHI, R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
GANGADHAR s/o GONDURAM TADME – Appellant
Versus
TRIMBAK s/o GOVINDRAO AKINGIRE – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Advocates for the petitioner and the respondent Nos. 2, 4,7 and 8.

( 2 ) THE petitioner challenges the orders passed by the authorities declaring that the third child of the petitioner was born on 18-3-2002 and not on 1-9-2001, as was sought to be contended by the petitioner and consequently declaring the petitioner to have been disqualified to be a member of the Gram Panchayat, sayedpur on the basis that a person getting a third child after the appointed date cannot continue to be a member of the village panchayat.

( 3 ) THE contention of the petitioners is that the authorities below did not give sufficient weightage to the birth certificate of the third child of the petitioner, issued by the Gram Sevak, who is given the powers of the Registrar under the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act, 1886, hereinafter referred to as "the said Act. " In other words, it is the contention of the petitioner that the presumptive value which is available to the contents of the birth certificate in terms of the provisions of the said Act read with section 114 of the evidence Act, 1872 has been totally ignored by the authorities below while rejecting the cl









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top