SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1068

A.P.LAVANDE
GAJANAN s/o PANDURANG SOLANKE – Appellant
Versus
SHEELA GAJANAN SOLANKE – Respondent


Judgment

A. P. LAVANDE, J.

( 1 ) THIS criminal revision application is filed by the applicant challenging the judgment and order dated 29-2-2000 passed by IInd additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur, allowing revision filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein against the judgment and order dated 16-4-1998 in Misc. Criminal case No. 221/1995.

( 2 ) I have heard Mr. Samel learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Ahirkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 3. None appeared on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 though they were duly served.

( 3 ) THE applicant married respondent No. 1 on 5-5-1985. Thereafter, relations between the husband and wife got strained, and ultimately on 9-12-1988 the applicant and respondent No. 1 executed mutual deed of divorce as well as separate consent deed, which is at Annexure-A. Respondent No. 1 on her behalf and on behalf of respondent No. 2, who was a minor, filed Misc. Criminal Case no. 221/1995 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Daryapur, claiming maintenance of Rs. 500/- per month for herself and Rs. 400/- per month for respondent No. 2- Pratik Solanke. The application was filed on 22-11-1995. In the said case, responden





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top