SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1368

ANOOP V.MOHTA
S. Sampath Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

ANOOP V. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, a Director of the Company, M/s deve Paints Limited, formerly known as M/s Garware paints Limited, (hereinafter referred as Company) has invoked the provisions of Section 482 of the Code of criminal Procedure and basically prays to quash and set aside the proceeding of Criminal Case No. 18 of 1996, pending before the Judicial Magistrate F. C. , 2nd Court, thane, Maharashtra.

( 2 ) THE proceeding arose in pursuance to the complaint dated 18/8/1995/ 30/8 1995, filed by the Provident Fund, Asstt. Commissioner, Regional p. F. Commissioner, Maharashtra and Goa.

( 3 ) IT has been alleged that the company and its officers have committed offence punishable under Section 405 and 406 of Indian Penal Code by committing the criminal breach of trust as defaulted in the payment of the contribution of the family pension fund, even though deducted from the salary of the employees of the said company. Criminal breach of trusty - Section405 (extract) is as under:"whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top