SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1596

A.H.JOSHI, P.B.GAIKWAD, V.G.PALSHIKAR
Sandip Vasantrao Lahare – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

V. G. PALSHIKAR, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition, the petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 56-B of the Maharashtra Cooperative societies Rules, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the "rules" for the purpose of brevity) on the ground that the provisions of that rule are contrary to the provisions of section 27 (34) of the Maharashtra Co-operative societies Act, 1960, (hereinafter referred to as the "act" for the purpose of brevity ).

( 2 ) THE facts necessary for adjudication of the questions raised in this petition stated in brief are: the respondent No. 3 Wakadi Vikas karyakari Society Limited, Wakadi, Taluka rahata District Ahmednagar is a notified society as contemplated by section 73ic of the Act. It will be called as a notified society for the purpose of clarity and brevity. The petitioner became a Member of the notified society on 27-3-2002 and since then he is the member of the notified society.

( 3 ) THE last general elections to the managing Committee of the notified society were held on 28-5-1999. Consequently, the term of five years of the said Managing committee came to an end on 27-5-2004. As required by Rule 56-B of the Rules, a list of voter












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top