SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1382

D.G.KARNIK
VASANTRAO VINAYAKRAO DESHMUKH – Appellant
Versus
TULSABAI, KARBHARIBONDARE – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) THIS Second Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 30th January, 1989, passed by the learned IInd Additional District Judge, Jalgaon allowing the appeal filed by the respondents, bearing Civil Appeal No. 344/1983.

( 3 ) THE property, bearing Gat No. 21 I/a (old Survey No. 98/1), admeasuring 2 H 30 Rs of village Rohini, Taluka Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalgaon (hereinafter referred to as "the suit property"), originally belonged to one tatyasaheb Parbatrao Deshmukh. By a document dated February 16, 1972, styled as a "conditional Sale-Deed", (Exh-20), he transferred the suit property to karbhari Tanha Bondare for a sum of Rs. 3500/ -. Present respondents are the heirs of the purchase Karbhari Tanha Bondare. The said conditional sale-deed contains a condition that in the event the vendor returned the sum of Rs. 3500/- within a period of three years, the purchaser would reconvey the suit land. Subsequently, by another registered sale-deed, dated January 1, 1980, the original owner Tatyasaheb Parbatrao Deshmukh sold and conveyed the suit property to vasantrao Vinayakrao Deshmukh, the appellant herein. The said sale-








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top