SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1255

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI
GOVERDHANDAS MULCHAND AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
BHERULAL UDERAM BAGADE – Respondent


Judgment

S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 227 of the constitution of India is directed against the judgment and order dated 10-2-1987 in Civil Appeal No. 65 of 1984. The judgment under challenge affirms the decree in Regular Civil Suit No. 323 of 1979 dated 2/-6-1983 of IInd Joint Civil Judge, j. D. , Dhule.

( 2 ) THE proceedings are under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House rates Control Act, 1947 (for short the Bombay Rent Act ). The petitioners are original plaintiffs whereas respondents are original defendants. The suit property is C. T. S. No. 1893 and 1824 belonging to the petitioners.

( 3 ) IT is common ground that respondents are tenants of the ground floor premises which consists of three rooms, ota and godown. It appears that initially two rooms and godown was let out to the father of the respondents. The rent was fixed at Rs. 100/- per month. Then the third room was also let and monthly rent was increased to Rs. 160/ -. In April, 1979, respondent took one more room adjacent to his premises from one Dekhabhai and claimed tenancy over it. The rent of the said room was fixed at Rs. 50/- per month. Thus, the respondent became tenant of the whole

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top