SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1126

K.J.ROHEE
SHAILENDRA KUMAR SENGUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) BY these applications under section 482 of the code of Criminal Procedure read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India issuance of summons by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 5th Court, Nagpur for the offence punishable under section 3 (1) (x), 3 (2) (vii) of the Scheduled castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "act") upon Criminal Complaint Case No. 152/2000 instituted by respondent No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the complainant) has been challenged.

( 2 ) THE complainant is a Sikh belonging to Mehtar caste which is a scheduled Caste. At the relevant time he was serving as Diesel Mechanic Grade i in South Eastern Railway, Motibagh Diesel Shed, Nagpur. Heeralal Pande, the petitioner in Criminal Application No. 2221/2003 (hereinafter referred to as accused No. 1) was serving as Sectional Engineer (Electrical ). Srinivasa kalyanaraman, the petitioner in Criminal Application No. 2524/2003 (hereinafter referred to as accused No. 2) was serving as Assistant Mechanical Engineer. Shailendrakumar Sengupta, the petitioner in Criminal Application No. 663/2003 (hereinafter referred to as accused No. 3) w















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top