S.B.DESHMUKH
Suryakanta w/o Rahul Shirsat – Appellant
Versus
Rahul s/o Gopalrao Shirsat – Respondent
S.B. Deshmukh, J.
1. 1. Rule, made returnable forthwith and heard by consent of parties.
2. 2. This petition is directed against the judgment dated 22-11-2002 passed by the Joint District Judge, Akola in Criminal Revision No. 35 of 2001 reversing the order dated 22-11-1999 passed below exhibit 15 in Misc. Criminal Case No. 146 of 1998 by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Akot.
3. Petitioner No. 1 is the wife of respondent No. 1 and petitioners No. 2 and 3 are their children. The petitioners had filed application under Section 127 Criminal Procedure Code before the learned Magistrate for enhancement of maintenance allowance granted to them. The said application remained without signature of petitioner No. 1 and, therefore, she filed application (exhibit 15) before the learned Magistrate seeking permission to put her thumb impression on the application filed under Section 127, Criminal Procedure Code. The respondent No. 1 opposed the application on the
ground that there is no provision to sign the application once it is put up and that the application was made before one year.
3. 4. After hearing both the sides, learned Magistrate held that the applicant was present at
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.