SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 926

D.D.SINHA, R.C.CHAVAN
RAMESH s/o DAULATRAO PACHGHARE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

D. D. SINHA, J.: - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP for the respondents.

2. The counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the instant case, after the notification under section 4( 1) of the Land Acquisition Act is published, the petitioners have taken objections to the acquisition of land. It is submitted that petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are the owners of Survey No. 28/1, admeasuring 2.58 hectare. Petitioner Nos. 4, 5, 6 and 7 are the owners of Survey No. 28/2, admeasuring 3.26 hectare. Petitioner No.8 is the owner of Survey No. 30/3A, admeasuring 1.49 hectare. Petitioner Nos. 9, 10, 11 and 12 are the owners of Survey No. 33/4, admeasuring 1.88 hectare and petitioner Nos. 13, 14 and 15 are the owners of Survey No. 34/1, admeasuring 1.27 hectare. All these lands are situated at village Palaswada. It is contended that the owners of these survey numbers have submitted separate objections in respect of the acquisition proceedings initiated by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. The counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the objections were raised on the ground of suitability of land, nature of land under acquisition, convenience






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top