A. H. JOSHI, J. : - Heard learned Advocates for the parties.

2. This is a Petition by the Society who is aggrieved by the decision of the Deputy Director of Education communicated by letter, dated 23rd April, 1991, that the Management was responsible to pay the salary and allowances of Smt. Vidya Devi Raut who is present respondent No.1, and consequential order issued by Education Officer, dated 23rd April, 1991, informing that salary and allowances towards period of unemployment of Smt. Vidya Devi Raut be paicl by the Management, and if not paid, the arrears be recovered from the Non -salary Grants payable to the School.

3. The brief background of the case, which needs to be adverted to, is narrated hereinafter.

4. Present respondent No.1 was appointed by the petitioner -Management as Assistant Teacher. Her services were terminated by notice, dated 2nd April, 1986, as the approval for appointment was for only one year. After six months m the termination, the Education Officer modified the approval and ordered it be for two years. When the modified approval was issued, the respondent No. 1 herein had already ceased to be an employee of the petitioner. Petitioner di