SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Bom) 54

K.SUBBA RAO, J.C.SHAH, S.M.SIKRI
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, M. P. , NAGPUR AND BHANDARA – Appellant
Versus
SETH GOVINDRAM SUGAR MILLS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SUBBA RAO, J. -Tgese two appeals by certificate arise out of the judgment of tge High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur, in Misc. Case No. 63 of 1961 from a reference under section 66 (2) of the Indian Income -tax Act, 1922, made by the Income -tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay.

2. To appreciate the contention of the parties the following genealogy will be useful:

Kalooram Todi


Govindram (died in January 1943)


Madanlal (predeceased his father) = Jankibai

Gangaprasad (died in 1931)


Nandlal (d. 9.12.1945) = Banaraibai


Venkatlal (b. 13.12.1931) Bachhulal


Bacobhulal (b. 25 -1 -1935)

Radheyshyam (predeceased his father) = Shantibai Yishwanath (adopted) (b. 13 -4 -1941)

After the death of Kalooram Todi, his two sons by name Govindram and Gangaprasad constituted a joint Hindu family which owned extensive property in Jaora State and a Sugar Mill called "Seth Govindram Sugar Mills" at Mahidpur Road in Holkar State. In the year 1942 Bachhulal filed a suit for partition against Govindram and obtained a decree therein. In due course the property was divided and a final decree was made. We are concerned in these appeals only with the Sugar Mills at Mahidpur Road. After the partitio























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top