SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1041

D.D.SINHA, R.C.CHAVAN
MAHARASHTRA RAJYA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA MAHAMANDAL, AMRAVATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

D. D. SINHA, J. : - Heard Shri B. G. Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri A. B. Choudhari, learned Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Shri V. R. Manohar, learend Senior Counsel for respondent No.3.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties.

3. Shri Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is a registered association of managements of recognized schools in the State of Maharashtra. The power of granting permission to start new Primary, Secondary or Higher Secondary School is vested in the State of Maharashtra- respondent No. 1 as per Secondary School Code. However, this Court by its judgment in the case of Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs. State of Maharashtra and others, reported in 2001(1) Mh.L.J. 776 issued mandatory directions to be followed by the State Government while granting permission to start new schools. It is contended that respondent No. 3 vide impugned order dated 16-5-2006 granted permission to start 1495 new Primary, Secondary and Higher Secondary Schools in the State of Maharashtra from Academic Session 2006-2007 in total breach of mandatory norms and ther














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top