SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1541

V.R.KINGAONKAR
RATNAMALA w/o ASHOKRAO SHINDE – Appellant
Versus
ELECTION OFFICER, GRAM PANCHAYAT, PALODI – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT :- Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

By sent of parties, Rule is finally heard.


2. By this petition, petitioners impugn order dated 29th July, 2006 by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad, confirming order of Ad Collector, Hingoli, whereby their election as Sarpanch and Upa-s respectively, are set aside.

3. There are seven members of Village Panchayat Palodi (Dist. Hi Admittedly, election was held on 24-8-2005 for post of Sarpanch an sarpanch. An election officer, who is Junior Engineer in Irrigation Department was appointed to conduct the election. The election officer convened a of the village panchayat members. The Panchayat members were informed the purpose of the meeting and the election proceedings were started. At 1:45 pm. three members of the village Panchayat submitted an application election officer and requested him to conduct the election by secret ball " election officer granted their request and decided to hold the election by ballot method. He distributed paper slips for use of the members/vote called Upon them to put tick mark against the names of those in favour of they wanted to cast the vote. There were two contest























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top