SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Bom) 69

N.L.ABHYANKAR, L.M.PARANJPE
SAKHARAM NARAYAN KHERDEKAR ADVOCATE, NAGPUR – Appellant
Versus
CITY OF NAGPUR CORPORATION, NAGPUR. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

ABHYANKAR J.-This petition raises an interesting and an important point of interpretation, under the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. This Act has been made applicable to Vidarbha region by the Extension and Amendment Act, 1960, applying the provisions of this Act all over the State of Maharashtra.

2. The petitioner, Shri S. N. Kherdekar, is an Advocate of this Court, and also the elected Secretary of the High Court Bar Association at Nagpur. The Association is a body registered under the Societies Registration Act. The petitioner has been practicing for the last 27 years in the High court and also enrolled under the Legal. Practitioners Act and now under the new Advocates Act, 1961.

3. The petitioner has stated that he is practicing at his own residence and does not maintain an establishment. He carries on professi6n by receiving briefs at his house. He has a clerk who looks after the court work. The clerk is a registered clerk under the rules of the High Court. The petitioner is governed by the Legal Practitioners Act and the Advocates Act. The petitioner, it is claimed, is also an officer of the Court, and is not running any firm or business, or organizing any














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top