JUDGMENT-This is a defendants second appeal directed against an appellate decision whereby the decree for partition and separate possession of the plaintiffs one-third share was modified by decreeing her full claim for possession of property on the basis of a will.

2. The suit property was held by one Bondku, who was the last burviving member of the family. He died on 10-8-1957, at the age of 95, leaving behind him three daughters-the plaintiff Rambha, defendant No. 4 Rangoo, and defendant No. I Bangoo. One other daughter Kewna had died issueless during the life-time of Bondku. The defendant No. 4: Rangoo has two sons-Nathu, defendant No.5 and Dayaram, defendant No.6. The defendant No.1 Bangoo, who is the youngest of the daughters, has two sons-Ragho, defendant No.2, and Sitaram, defendant No.3, and a daughter Vithabai. This Sitaram son of Bangoo died without any heirs and his name was struck off from the suit. Bondku had left the property in suit at the time of his death.

3. The plaintiff-respondent Rambha filed her suit on the following allegations: Bondku got the plaintiff l~ambha married to his sisters son who did not have any property. The other two daughters, Bangoo and Rango

Click Here to Read the rest of this document