SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Bom) 58

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M. G. Chitale and D. G. Palekar JJ.
N. E. MERCHANT - Applicant.
V.
THE BOMBAY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - Respondent
Advocate Appeared
For appellants-W. N. Yande and R. W. Adik
For State-M. A. Rane, Asst Govt. Pleader.

The establishment of a chartered accountant is not a commercial establishment within the meaning of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, and is therefore not subject to the Act's registration requirements.

Headnote:

BOMBAY SHOPS AND ESTABLISHMENTS ACT - SECTION 7(2-A) - REGISTRATION OF ESTABLISHMENTS - APPLICABILITY TO CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS - PROFESSION OR COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT - INTERPRETATION.

Fact of the Case:

The applicants, chartered accountants, were convicted under section 52(a) read with section 7(2)(2-A) of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, for failing to renew their registration certificate. They challenged the applicability of the Act to their establishment, arguing that it was not a commercial establishment.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the applicants' establishment was not a commercial establishment within the meaning of the Act. It found that the applicants were practicing a profession, not a business or trade, and that their activities did not have a commercial character.

Issues: 1. Whether the applicants' establishment was a commercial establishment within the meaning of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948? 2. Whether the applicants were practicing a profession or a business or trade?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The definition of "commercial establishment" in the Act includes establishments that carry on any business, trade, or profession, but excludes professions that are not of a commercial nature. 2. The court found that the applicants were practicing a profession, not a business or trade, and that their activities did not have a commercial character. It noted that the applicants were members of a recognized professional body with a code of conduct, that they were required to have specialized knowledge and training, and that their work involved the exercise of personal skill, intelligence, and integrity.

Final Decision: The court set aside the conviction and sentence, holding that the applicants' establishment was not a commercial establishment and that they were not liable under the Act.

JUDGMENT

PALEKAR J.-This is a revision from an order of conviction and sentence passed by the Honorary Presidency Magistrate (Municipal Bench), Bombay, under section 52 (a) read with section 7 (2) (2-A) of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. The applicants are chartered accountants carrying on their business in the name Messrs. N. E. Merchant and Co. Both of them are qualified chartered accountants entitled to practice as such in their own right.

2. One Narayan Mahadeo Malik, who is the Inspector in the Shops and.

Establishments Department of the Bombay Municipal Corporation, visited the establishments of the applicants on July 15, 1965, and found the following contraventions of the Act, viz., the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948:

(1) The Registration Certificate was not displayed at a conspicuous place in the establishment.

(2) Application in Form "B" together with the prescribed fee for the renewal of the Registration Certificate No. B-II-1831 for the year 1965 was not submitted.

The learned Magistrate held that the first contravention had not been proved but the second was proved. He, therefore, convicted the applicants under section 52 (a.) read with section 7 (2) (2-A) of the Act.

3. Section 7 (2-A) of the Act provides:

"A registration certificate granted under sub-section (2), shall be valid up to the end of the year for which it is granted. An application for the renewal of a registration certificate shall be submitted not less than fifteen days before the date of expiry of the registration certificate or of the renewed registration certificate, as the Case may be, and shall be accompanied by such fees, and the renewed registration certificate shall be in such form, as may be prescribed."

The form prescribed is form B. There is no dispute that the applicants had obtained a registration certificate under section 7 (1) and (2) of the Act for the year 1964 being Registration Certificate No. B-II-1831, but no application for the renewal of that certificate was made as required by sub-section (2A). In other words, the contravention is admitted. The contention which was put forward on behalf of the applicants was that the Act was not applicable to the establishment of the applicants, and, therefore, there was no need to apply either for a registration certificate under section 7 (1) and (2), or for a renewal of that registration certificate under sub-section (2A). That contention, however, was negatived by the learned Honorary Presidency Magistrate, and on conviction the applicants were ordered to pay a fine of &s. 30 each or in default suffer simple imprisonment for seven days.

4. Section 7 of the Act is found in Chapter II dealing with Registration of Establishments and requires the employer of every establishment to send to the Inspector of the local area concerned a statement in a prescribed form together with a fee for obtaining a registration certificate. The applicants con. tend that they do not come within the definition of either the word "employer" or "establishment" as defined in the Act, and hence there could be no contravention of any of the provisions of section 7.

5. The Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the regulation of conditions of work and employment in shops, commercial establishments, residential hotels, restaurants, eating houses, theatres, other places of public amusement or entertainment and other establishments.

6. Section 2 under its clause (7) defines the word "employer". Employer means a person owning or having ultimate control over the affairs of an establishment. Under clause (8) "establishment" means a shop, commercial establishment, residential hotel, restaurant, eating house, theatre, or other place of public amusement or entertainment to which this Act applies and includes such other establishment as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare to be an establishment for the purp



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top