JUDGMENT-The only question which arises in this appeal tiled by Prahhudas Kalyanji Adhia against his conviction under section 18 (c) read with section 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 for manufacturing, stocking and selling on July 15, 1966, the substance which he described as D. D. T. compound without a licence under the said Act is, whether the said D. D. T. compound is a drug within the meaning of that Act,.

2. The accused did not dispute that at the relevant time he was manufacturing, stocking and selling at 121, Parel Tank Road, Parel, Bombay 12, as proprietor of M/s. Hill Side Products, D. D. T. compound, but he denied that the substance which he was manufacturing of selling was intended to be used for the destruction of vermin or insects which caused disease in human beings or animals as mentioned in a notification of the Government of India under section 3 (b) (ii). He relied on a label which was u8eu on his product which he produced. On one side of the laLel there is a picture of a theatre and it is written:

"Theatre Brand

D D T Co.

Technical D D T cum Malathion.

Superior Quality.

Hill-side Products, Bombay."

On another side of the label it is written:

"Not for medica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document