SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 1006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
(R. S. Mohite, J.)
BABLU s/o RAGHOJI KAITHWAS - Applicant
Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Non-applicant
Advocates appeared
For applicant: E. W Nawab, A. S. Suryawanshi, Mrs. S. D. Kusram
For State/Non-applicant : M. P. Badar

The court considered the severity of the offense, the period of custody, and the non-punishable nature of the offense with life imprisonment or death in granting bail to the accused.

Headnote:

Bail - Wildlife Protection Act - Grant of Bail to Accused Possessing Leopard Skin

Fact of the Case:

The applicant, a student, was found in possession of a Leopard skin and was accused under sections 9, 39, 48(a), (b) and read with section 51 of the Wild Life Protection Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that since the maximum sentence for the offense was six years and the applicant had been in custody for about two months, bail was granted on the condition of executing a P. R Bond and reporting to R.F.O., Ramtek.

Issues: Grant of bail to the accused in possession of Leopard skin under the Wild Life Protection Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the severity of the offense, the period of custody, and the non-punishable nature of the offense with life imprisonment or death in granting bail to the accused.

Final Decision: The applicant was directed to be released on bail upon executing a P. R Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount, subject to the condition of reporting to R.F.O., Ramtek.

JUDGMENT :- This is an application for grant of bail. The applicant claims to be a student of Narendra Tidke College, Ramtek in B.A.-IT. He is shown as accused in P.O.R No. 191/13/2002 registered by Asst. Warden, Wild life and RF.O., Ramtek on 18-7-2002. The allegation against the applicant is that he was found in possession of a Leopard skin. The contention is that the applicant has committed an offence under sections 9, 39, 48(a), (b) and read with section 51 of the Wild Life Protection Act. It is the prosecution case that applicant contended that he had purchased Leopards skin from one Cobbler for Rs. 7,400/-. Shri Badar, the learned counsel for the State states that said Cobbler has been arrested. Since Cobbler has been arrested and Leopards skin is seized and the offence is not punishable with life imprisonment or death, and maximum sentence is of six years, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. The applicant has been in custody for about two months.

2. In the circumstances, it is directed that applicant be released on bail on his executing a P. R Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to the condition that he will report to R.F.O., Ramtek, as and when called to do so, in writing.

Order accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top