SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 814

R.S.MOHITE
BISMILLAKHA s/o SALARKHA PATHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT :- Heard Shri Mardikar, Advocate for the appellants and Smt. Dangre, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State.

2. Criminal Appeal No. 322 of 2002 is filed by the original accused No.1 Bismillakha Salarkha Path an in Special Case No.3 of 1995. Appeal No. 499 of 2002 is filed by original accused No.2 in Special Case No.3 of 1995 - Kisan Nagorao Chipade. These appellants, for the sake of convenience are hereinafter referred to as accused Nos. 1 and 2 respectively and both these appeal convicting both the accused of offences punishable under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentencing the accused to suffer R. I. for one year in respect of the offence punishable under section 13(1)(d) of the Act and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to suffer R. I. for three months and further sentencing the accused to suffer R. I. for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default to suffer R. I. for three months under section 7 of the Act and separately sentencing accused No. 2 to suffer R. I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- in default to suffer R. I. for nine months in respect of the o
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top