S.J.VAZIFDAR
Pacific Refractories Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Stein Heurtey India Projects Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
2. The suit is filed to recover a sum of Rs.28,61,938/- together with interest at 18% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till realisation for the goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff raised invoices in respect of the said sales. The supply however was made pursuant to a contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant as pleaded in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the plaint.
3. Neither Counsel made an application to lead evidence. Mr. Kutty, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff, confirmed his submissions in support of his case that the leave was granted correctly only on the basis of the contract having allegedly been entered into in Bombay. Mr. Tulzapurkar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf Df the defendant, in support of his contention that the leave granted ought to be revoked, submitted that the contract had been entered into in Calcutta. He further submitted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.