SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1594

V.K.TAHILRAMANI, RANJANA DESAI
Dattu Appa Patil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Per DESAI RANJANA (Smt.), J.: - In the instant writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged order dated 5/3/ 1994 passed by respondent 2 - the Settlement Commissioner and Director of Land Records, Pune, and order dated 13/10/1995 passed by respondent 1 - the State of Maharashtra.

2. The facts, which give rise to the present petition may be shortly stated.

Appa Rama Patil, the father of the original petitioner owned agricultural lands in Village Asurle, Taluka Panhale, District Kolhapur. Yesaba Rama Patil - the father of respondent 3 owned Jirayat land bearing Survey No. 25/6 admeasuring 10 Gunthas and one Rama Dhondi Patil owned land bearing Survey No. 77/ 3B. In 1962, the Consolidation Scheme framed under The Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 (for short, "the said - Act") came to be applied to Village Asrule. The work of consolidating small pieces of lands into larger blocks was undertaken. As a part of the Consolidation Scheme, land bearing Survey No. 25/6 admeasuring 10 Gunthas belonging to Yesba Rama Patil- the father of respondent 3 was allotted to Appa Rama Patil - the fathe

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top