SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1808

D.K.DESHMUKH
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Artson Engineering Ltd. – Respondent


DESHMUKH D.K., J.: - By this petition the Award dated 30.6.2005 made by the learned sole Arbitrator directing the petitioner to pay to the respondent an amount of Rs. 3,12,74,444/- with interest, is challenged.

The facts that are relevant and material for deciding this petition are that the respondent entered into a contract for execution of work of "Crude Distribution system" for AUV project at Gujarat Refinery site Vadodara of the petitioner-Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The contract contained an arbitration clause. As per the arbitration clause in case of dispute on receipt of notice of arbitration from the claimant, the General Manager of the petitioner had to nominate a panel of three persons and the claimant had to select one of them as sole arbitrator. The respondent filed the petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 being Arbitration Application No. 31 of 2002. In that petition, the parties arrived at the consent terms. By virtue of those consent terms one Mr. H. Parekh was appointed as arbitrator. By the consent terms time for making award was fixed. During the period that was fixed for making the award Mr. Parekh could not make the award. The pa























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top