SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1027

N.A.BRITTO
Deelip Apte. – Appellant
Versus
Nilesh P. Salgaonkar – Respondent


BRITTO N.A., J.: - The subject matter of the dispute between the complainant and the accused are three cheques which have been dishonoured, the details of which are as follows:

1. Cheque No. 4605574 dated 28.11.2003 for Rs.50.000/-.

2. Cheque No. 4605575 dated 28.11.2003 for Rs.50.000/-.

3. Cheque No. 4605576 dated 1.12.2003 for Rs. 70.000/-.

2. Broadly stated, the case of the complainant is that the said three cheques were given by the accused to the complainant by way of payment of Rs. 1,70,000/advanced by the complainant to the accused in the first week of November, 2003. Likewise, it was the case of the accused that the said three cheques were given to the complainant by way of security. As regards the first two cheques, the complainant sent a notice to the accused dated 1.12.2003 and regarding the third cheque, the complainant sent the notice dated 9.1.2004. Both the notices were sent by registered A.D. and upon noncompliance of the said notices, the accused rued two complaints. The first complaint in respect of the two cheques came to be registered as C.C. No. 219/P/04/B while the second complaint came to be registered as C.C. No. 376/OA/O4/C. The said two complaints were allotte
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top