SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Bom) 159

J.R.MUDHOLKAR, M.H.KANIA
HAKAM MAHOMED JAINWALA – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

KAMA J.- The appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 397 of 1969 was original accused No. 1 and will be referred to hereinafter as accused No. 1. The appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 481 of 1969 was original accused No.2 and will be referred to hereinafter as accused No.2. Accused Nos 1 and 2 were put up for trial along with two other accused before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay. All the accused were charged with the offence under section 302 read with section 3l, Indian Penal Code, and in the alternative accused No. I was charged with the offence under section 302, Indian Penal Code, and accused No 2 and the other accused were charged with the offence under section 302 read with section 109, Indian Penal Code. The learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted accused No. 1 of the offence under section 302, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and accused No.2 of the offence under section 302 read with section 109, Indian Penal Code, and also sentenced him to imprisonment for life. These two accused have come in appeal against their convictions and sentences before us. The other two accused were acquitted and no appeals were filed aga



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top