M.N.CHANDURKAR, P.S.SHAH
SANTOKSINGH – Appellant
Versus
RADHESHYAM – Respondent
CHANDURKARJ.-This revision application has been referred to the Division Bench in view of the divergence of judicial view On the question as to whether the legal representatives of a plaintiff who was granted permission to sue in forma pauperis can continue the suit without payment of court-fee in case he is possessed of sufficient means to pay the required court-fee.
2. One Beant Kuwal widow of Balwantsingh had filed an application for permission to sue the defendants in forma pauperis and the relief claimed against the defendants was the declaration of the plaintiff's title to the suit property which consisted of a house and a decree for possession and mesne profits against original defendants Nos. 1 to 3. This application was allowed on 2-11-1965 and the application was registered as a regular civil suit on that date. A revision application challenging the order of the trial Court granting permission to the original applicant to file a suit in forma pauperies came to be rejected. However, on 29-8-1967 Beant Kuwar died and the present applicants Nos. I to 3 applied to the trial Court on 25-11-1967 for being brought on record as legal representatives. This application was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.