SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Bom) 115

B.A.MASODKAR, C.T.DIGHE
GOVINDRAO ATMARAMJI WARJUKAR – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

MASODKAR, J. - The two petitioners filed the present petition on September 30, 1975, challenging the Ordinance No. VII of 1975 as void and ultra vires as well as unconstitutional and beyond the legislative competence and the powers of the State Legislature. They, sought ad interim writs regarding the enforcement, of those provisions, Petitioners alleged that they are money-lenders by profession and carryon the business of money-lending and are independently registered under the Bombay Money-lenders Act. They held independent licences. This joint petition was entertained on 1-10-1975 and there being several such petitions, a common order was made as was passed in Special Civil Application No. 1172 of 1975. It maybe mentioned that both before this Benchas well as in Bombay several petitions challenging the provisions of this Ordinance and thereafter the Debt Relief Act, were filed. In several petitions more than one money-lenders were joined all petitioners. All the matter being urgent, one set of court-fee which was affixed to such petition was held sufficient and by way of concession it wall directed that qua-each additional petitioner, court-fee payable on his independent















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top