SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Bom) 81

B.LENTIN, M.N.CHANDURKAR
SADASHIV KERU JAMDADE – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

CHANDURKAR J.-This petition by the three petitioners, out of whom petitioner No.1 is the father and petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 are his sons, is directed against a notification issued by the Commissioner, Poona Division, Poona, under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, and a Government Resolution No. RPA-1069-R. I. dated 31st October 1969.

2. Field Survey No. 534/4 area 3 acres 6 gunthas is owned by petitioner No.2 and field Survey No. 579/48 stands in the name of the petitioner No.3, though both these fields originally stood in the name of petitioner No.1. A notification came to be issued by the Commissioner, Poona Division, under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act acquiring a part of the area of Survey No. 534/4 and the entire Survey No. 579/4B. This notification refers to several other fields which, according to the notification, were needed for a public purpose which was stated as for "resettlement of the persons likely to be affected due to Krishna Dhom Project". The Krishna Dhom Project is a project undertaken by the State of Maharashtra for construction of a dam at Dhom. According to the plait; this dam is to have canals for irrigation both on the left and the ri












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top