SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Bom) 93

P.R.MRIDUL, G.N.VAIDYA
SHANTA WADHWA – Appellant
Versus
PURSHOTTAM MOHANDAS WADHWA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

VAIDYA J. - The above Letters Patent Appeal is filed by the wife, against the judgment, dated September 24, 1975, in F. A. No. 92 of 1975, confirming the judgment and decree dated February 6, 1975, passed by a Judge of the Bombay City Civil Court in her petition, under section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for a decree for judicial separation. In the petition she had also prayed for an injunction restraining the husband and his servants and agents from entering flat No.4, situate in Ganga Bhavan, 24th Road, Bandra, which is the matrimonial home of the couple, and for a costs of the petition.

2. The petitioner was married to the respondent on March 10, 1954, according to the Hindu Vedic Rites. It was a love marriage. She is enrolled as an advocate of this Court; and she has been practising in the Courts in Bombay. The allegations which she made in the petition against the husband may be briefly summarised as under:

3. There is no issue of the marriage. The marriage with the respondent appeared to have gone on smoothly for sometime. They lived and cohabited at the petitioner's parents' place at Bhatia Bhavan, Parel, for six months. She managed to find a ~ace; and they
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top