SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Bom) 119

G.N.VAIDYA, A.R.SHIMPI
HARIBAI W/o DATTU SUTAR – Appellant
Versus
BABA ANNA SUTAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

VAIDYA J.-The above Second Appeal was referred to a Division, Bench by Kania, J. on March 24, 1976-.

2. The Second Appeal arose out of a suit tried by the appellant, Haribail Dattu Sutar, on April 4, 1967, to get possession of the property described at Serial No.4 in para I and also to get possession of the remaining one half portion of the property at Serial No. 3, in para I of the plaint; and for an injunction restraining the defendants Nos. 1 and 2 from obstructing the plaintiff's Vahiwat in the property at Serial No.5 in the plaint.

3. The property described at Serial Nos. 3 and14 in para 1 consisted or agricultural lands. The property at Serial No.5 consisted of a house and an open site. These properties originally belonged to' Banubai widow of Tatoba Sutar. She had two daughters viz. the plaintiff and one Bhagirathi. Bhagirathi died long ago. Plaintiff Haribai, who was married, was staying with her mother during Banubai's lifetime, looking after the needs of Banubai. Banubai executed a Will on October 30, 1961. The Will is at Ex. 79. It was executed in favour of the plaintiff and the husband of Bhagirathibai, viz. Chandrappa. Chandrappa executed a registered release









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top